roachboy

sprocket:

i didnt cite an article. that is why there is no citation. usually, a citation accompanies an article cited. that is how it generally works.
i presented what i did write as an equally plausible interpretation of the article as anything that preceded it.

as for the questionable status of the washington times, this should be obvious to anyone: owned by the unification church, faithful lackey of the contemporary extreme right in the general image of things moonie around the world. dont believe me? look it up for yourself.

as for the interpretation itself, i really am not concerned that you, sprocket, find it paranoid--what interests me more is that it is a plausible interpretation of this type of action. i think it explains the rather mess better than i imagine you would be able to. but go ahead and prove me wrong. i would prefer to be wrong on this, rather than find this kind of thing plausible. because so far as i can tell, there really is no limit to karl rove's willingness and ability instrumentalize just about anything.

__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite