i suspect that you understand "activitist" as a term that designates judge with whom you disagree politically, mojo.
but the latest turns in far right land seem to render even that understanding of the term moot.
so now, at the hands of such wunderkind as cornyn, the term seems to refer, if to anything, to the requirement that all judges in all situations conform precisely to the desires of the far right.
if they do not, then they--well what?--face the possibility of idiots like delay and cornyn claiming that violence against judges is a form of legitimate political expression--
(a claim that self-evidently would only obtain with reference to actions carried out by the far right)
from which one can concluce that these people--who are as horrifying as this is, in positions of authority--are advocating something like a putsch (or series of putsches) directed against the judiciary.
and why not?
it worked in early 1930s germany--why not here now?
quite a fine bunch you carry water for, mojo.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
Last edited by roachboy; 04-05-2005 at 11:58 AM..
|