That's just a case of unethical journalism. Come on fellas... all the pics we could get of any given athlete, do we have to stoop to blatant demoralizing sensationialism? I know a picture can speak a thousand words but there has to be numerous other choices that speak as much but much more eleguently. Just my thoughts. It seems like Phil is portrayed as the bumbling runner up who never can be respected on his incredible achievements alone----- only compared to the likes of Tiger or Vijhay, or Ernie, et. al.
