|
the 'moral relativism' argument is specifically designed to paint things as having to choose between two clearly defined right and wrong answers. It's the diehard republican(note that i'm not saying average conservative here) strategy to insure that those who aren't on the extreme of either side feel they have to choose 'the right' or moral choice instead of allowing that moderate or centrist to stray to a middle party.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|