Quote:
|
Originally Posted by guccilvr
The tournament isn't always an accurate measuring device of top conference(s). If that were the case then you'd never see upsets and the tournament would be boring. It's just not like that.
|
so i guess your
subjective opinion provides a more accurate assessment?
Quote:
|
Let's hear it for the big ten! They had a great year and since they've only had one good year that automatically puts them as the best conference in the nation!
|
here are the final four teams since 1999:
1999 Connecticut, Duke, Michigan St., Ohio St.
2000 Michigan St., Florida, North Carolina, Wisconsin
2001 Duke, Arizona, Maryland, Michigan St.
2002 Maryland, Indiana, Kansas, Oklahoma
2003 Syracuse, Kansas, Marquette, Texas
2004 Connecticut, Georgia Tech, Duke, Oklahoma St.
2005 Illinois, Louisville, UNC, Michigan St.
ACC - 8
Big Ten - 8
Big XII - 5
Big East - 3 (but all three were NCs)
i'm not really seeing how your precious ACC conference has proved their alleged dominance, in this year or the previous 5 before it. and if you want to go back even further... lets look at NCs. UCLA alone has more NCs than all the ACC teams combined. does that make the Pac-ten the best conference in the nation?
Quote:
Cheer for the conference you like, but don't be dillusional. The ACC <b>IS</b> the power conference in the Nation.
I can't wait till when a few years from now the ACC will be the power conference in Basketball and Football.
|
my point is, you are the one who seems dillusional. you're claiming a dominance over the other conferences that simply doesn't exist... and on top of that, you PREDICT THE FUTURE. i don't know how someone could get any more dillusional than that.