Quote:
|
The microtubules exhibit quantam computing behaviour, and, crucially, their structure is so fine that minute gravitational changes during their creation, such as the alignment of planets, can have an effect.
|
Sounds like a pretty dubious claim. How can planets and other such objects have a greater effect on the formation of the microtubules than the gravity of the Earth?
If gravity really played such a large part during microtubular formation then imagine standing on one's head.
And of course, microtubules and the cytoskeletons of neurons are not DNA.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by notamongoose
I think the most compelling evidence for the end date is in Terrence McKenna's Timewave. Simply based on the 6,000 year old I Ching, his mathematical analysis produced a wave that fit the changes in events throughout history. From the building of the egyptian pyramids, to the announcement of Einstein's theory of general relativity, all periods of great advancement and upheaval coincide with dips in the timewave graph. And the accelerating rate of technological change in the past 150 years coincides with a lengthened dip in the wave that approaches, then reaches zero, in 2012.
|
What the hell is a Timewave? How is it different from a Timecube?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by notamongoose
The I Ching, and the Tao Te Ching, are believed to be texts common to the roots of all the world's major religions. The fact that it actually has encoded within a map of historical change must say something for the validity of making predictions.
|
Oh, I see. This has nothing to do with the Timecube, but rather with the
I-Ching.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alex Chiu
In I-Ching, there are Ying and Yang. (brightness and darkness) In animals, there are DNA and RNA. In I-Ching, there are a total of 64 hexagrams. In animals, the number of codons in the genetic code is also 64. In I-Ching, Ying separates into two, and Yang separates into two. That makes four. Each of the four separates into two. That makes eight. Each of the eight separates into two. That makes 64. In biochemistry, DNA and RNA become four nucleotide bases. Then both the DNA and RNA separate into 2. Then those chemicals also separate into 2. At the end, there are exactly 64 codons in the genetic code.
There are 64 hexagrams in I-Ching, and there are 64 codons in the universal genetic code. I-Ching hexagrams are being composed of 3 symbols of 2 lines each. The codons are composed of 4 nucleic acids taken 3 at a time. The problem is: which nucleic acid corresponds to which I-Ching symbol?
|