View Single Post
Old 03-26-2005, 10:35 PM   #18 (permalink)
Manx
Loser
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by irateplatypus
you told me that your opinion of what i believe cannot be wrong because it's your opinion... that really does sum up quite a bit.
Subjectivity must not be your strong point.
Quote:
your thread is, from the start, concerned with the influence people of religious backgrounds exert on the conservative politicians in this country. it seems that you consider morality (which can be a purely secular endeavor) to be null when born out of a religious context, putting such moral codes into a separate category.
I honestly don't know how you got from the first part to the second part, or why you have an issue with the third. Unless you really just want it to be the case.

Close on the first part, this thread is about the influence conservative people focused on religion exert over conservative people not focused on religion. No I do not consider morality to be null when born out of a religious context - and although you've been arguing that all through out this thread, in reality, you just made it up. And yes, I put religious-based moral codes into a category I label "religious-based moral codes", which is distinct from the "fiscal-based moral codes" category.
Quote:
if moral understanding from religion is unacceptable in the public forum, i'd love to know what you consider to be acceptable.
More pulled out of thin air unrelated to topic nonsense.
Quote:
but i'll bite: i don't think that a major split will occur, but mainly for the reasons that i've been trying to drive at (the differing perceptions of how moral positions are formed in the political arena). moral decisions made by the bulk of religious people have too much relevance with the conservative agenda at large. the nature of truth, the role of government, and the responsibilities of the individual enjoy a strong link between the current iteration of christianity and conservative politics. while it may be a marriage of convenience... it's much more convenient than any current alternative.
It's good to see you are finally on topic (regardless of whether you think you've been effectively doing so all along). I understand you personally feel that it is much more convenient. I don't expect to learn much more from you in this thread, as difficult as it has been to learn the little I have - because you are a conservative who aligns yourself with many of the religious morals as well as many of the traditional fiscal morals. For you, it is a marriage made in heaven (that's pun, get it?). For many conservatives, it is not. Hence, the thread.
Manx is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360