Thread: Good Thursday?
View Single Post
Old 03-25-2005, 04:26 PM   #19 (permalink)
hilbert25
Psycho
 
hilbert25's Avatar
 
Location: nOvA
Quote:
Originally Posted by SecretMethod70
There is a more clear, more significant discrepancy in the bible concerning the crucifixion and that is that John places Jesus as having died on the day BEFORE the Passover feast and the others place him dying the day of. In Mark, Matthew, and Luke, Jesus eats a Passover meal before he dies. However, he does not do so in John - the last supper is eaten before Passover begins. In John, the process of Jesus crucifixion begins at noon on the day of preparation for Passover - the time when the Jewish priests begin slaughtering the lambs for passover, creating an effective metaphor in the story. This discrepancy is only really a problem if one insist that the bible is literally true though. Looking at it from a more literary standpiont, the choice of John to have Jesus crucified while the passover lambs where also being slaughtered fits quite well with the overall portrayal he makes of Jesus and his meaning.
Totally true. Another thing to add is that John was written some 100+ years after the events and 50+ years after the others. Quibbling over little things like dates are pointless because the things in the Bible are not there to record what happened like a newspaper. If you want that, simply go find the Roman records of the Crucifixion and figure out the date there, taking into accountthe recentering of the Gregorian Calendar of course. Want another Date discrepancy, how about the time between the Annunciation and Christmas, now there's one that should really throw you for a loop, unless you know when the actual Birth was, which then makes a lot more sense.

But the idea that the Bible isn't pure fact shocks people, many of which are the same people that go nuts about "discovering" the "lost gospels." Of which there are tons, most of which are crap, none of which are believed to be "inspired" by the Church, be it Catholic, Anglican, or Orthodox. The problem also permeates the so-called religious "leaders" that protest Dan Browne on the grounds that Jesus didn't have kid's in the Bible.
hilbert25 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360