Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stevo
"as you can see from this thread alone" means nothing. Shall I point to a thread where conservatives did not use one-lines and libs did? and then use that as my evidence that libs rely on one-liners to get their message out, and conservatives use extended dialogue?
One thread proves nothing. I can't wait untill I get tomorrows right-wing memo in the mail, then I'll show the lots of ya.
|
Of course it means something.
What you essentially did was this:
A lot of liberals think conservatives are stupid, but really they just can't accept that conservatives think differently. Therefore, no matter what I say (for example, err on the side of life), it is applicable and well thought through.
But since no one claimed that any statement (for example, err on the side of life) is due to the stupidity of conservatives, what you tried to do was simply to mask on empty statement behind yet another empty statement.
Instead of describing HOW the
err on the side of life statement is AT ALL applicable to the Schiavo case, you simply reiterated that it is and then tried to change the subject.