Let me sum up NCB's argument and mentality in this case as it relates to politics, aside from the right to life/ right to death debate:
-Family is more important and has say over court systems.
-In cases where a husband and parents disagree, the parents have the rights.
-It is against common sense to allow the courts to settle matters between family
-The Schindler family should not have to cover the actual medical expenses should they get custody, that should be left to the tax payers and insurance company.
-The court/legal system has overstepped it authority by interfering in such a family dispute, and it is up to the Federal Gov to stop this "activism"
What NCB still hasn't clarified for us:
- If you argued in "gay marriage" threads about the sanctity of marriage, then why are you arguing for interfering in that sanctity now? Becuase you don't like the husband, and suspect his actions, doesn't actually give any government authority to jave a say according to your previous marriage arguments.
Please clarrify..
You really are talking out your ass at this point. Would you care to deny any of the above bias's? Would you care to define who will cover the costs associated with her care? How about how long she should be kept alive? Indefinitly?
Also it;s worth knowing should you choose to answer, what religion and subset are you Son, I mean NCB?
__________________
Seen on an employer evaluation:
"The wheel is turning but the hamsters dead"
____________________________
Is arch13 really a porn diety ? find out after the film at 11.
-Nanofever
Last edited by tecoyah; 03-20-2005 at 04:33 PM..
|