Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hannukah harry
i think we should err on the side of what she would want. and according to the courts, it has been proven beyond a resonable doubt that she would not want to remain in a pvs.
if you think starving her to death is torture, what do you think starving her multiple times is?
|
Her husband declaring years after her injury (and months after his malpractice award) that she would have wnated to be dead instead of this does not constitute evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.
But instead of using legal terms and such, let's just use common sense. Why didn't he declare her supposed desires early on? Why wait years after the fact? Is it too convienent to have him declare this after the litigation was completed? Maybe I'm just too much of a simpleton, but something doesn't add up here.