Quote:
|
Originally Posted by alansmithee
According to the government's position in their case in Florida (which was affirmed), the purpose of marriage laws IS to enable the raising of children by their BIOLOGICAL (and that was the term used in the decision) parents. And I personally would deny all those you named the right to get married (I assume all are unable to have children naturally [I don't know what CFBC couples are, nor AIS women]). But it would be hard to screen for all of those things; it's very easy to see that homosexual couples can't have children. And as I said above, it's still debatable that it's good for children to be raised by homosexuals.
|
I hope I'm not out of line asking for clairification on something. Above you said "And I personally would deny all those you named the right to get married", "all those" being people unable to have biological children. I take this to mean that you do not believe that people who have some type of sexual or reproductive complication (unable to conceive/produce sperm/etc.) should be allowed to marry. Welll, I want to make sure I'm right about that first off, before what I ask next.
Where does this belief come from? Is it evolutionist? Is it religious? Is it based in experience? I'm honestly just curious, as an opinion like that is rare in my experience.