Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojo_PeiPei
It pertains to her husband's motives, the guy who claims she said she wanted to die, which has no real merit because there is nothing that backs up his claims. If he were to get hauled into court his argument wouldn't stand up because it's based on hearsay.
|
First of all, I haven't seen any evidence that there is a life insurance policy other than a hell of a lot of people posting opinions on the Internet claiming there is. Second, his claim that his wife did not want to remain in the condition she is in is supported by multiple people. Third, he WAS hauled into court (for 5 years) to defend his statement. And in 5 years of testimony with all kinds of accusations, it has been found that it is clear and compelling that Terri Schiavo would not want to remain in this condition. And fourth, he turned down a $1 million offer to let her parents decide the outcome.
You are essentially prolonging the case on your grounds of suspicion, as repeated by untold numbers of Internet users. The courts, having access to all the information, unequivocally disagree with untold numbers of Internet users. Your uninformed suspicions are not justification for doubting the merits of the courts decision.