Quote:
Originally Posted by alansmithee
There's no such thing as "gay marriage". Gays can get married just like other people.
|
If you intentionally said that as a joke: Hahahaha.
If you're serious: Do you know what the word "contradiction" means? Something that contains contradictory elements. A See synonym of opposite. You said "There is no such thing as gay marriage", then you followed with the statemet "gay can get married all the time". I sincerly hope you see the contradiction. I hope you also see that statements like these in opening your response will result in people either skipping over your post, or already having an opinion of you before they get to read what you get to say that's really important.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alansmithee
And for your second point, are you denying the right of a church to preach their religion? There's a lot worse being done in the name of religion than trying to alter someone's behavior.
|
I'm condeming the church for acting in a bigotous manner, which does not accuratly represent the God that they worship. Just like I don't agree with the crusades and the inquisition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alansmithee
As for the whole "dirty looks and disrespect", I've seen people with mowhawks and piercings get the same treatment? Where's the outcry for their rights? Or what about the dirty look you would get for picking your nose? The nosepickers have had their rights trampled for too long, we must defend their right to pick! Some hetero couples get dirty looks for acting like a couple-we must free the unattractive from the tyranny of inpulchritudiphobes! Give me a break .
|
People with mohawks arn't being denied the eight to a civil union last I heard, so this is different.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alansmithee
It does trivialize the entirety of the civil rights movement. There is no apt comparison. One group is defined by their actions, another by innate biological differences which they can neither control nor mitigate. There are no laws working against homosexuals. If society has anything against homosexuals, it's because they do not approve of homosexual behavior. They are treated as less than equal by people who disapprove of their behavior. Many other forms of behavior cause people to treat them as less than equal, yet only homosexuals seem to want their behavior elevated. I have no problem with homosexuals trying to make their behavior more accepted; likewise I have no problem with groups trying to make homosexual behavior less accepted. It's up to the efforts of each of these groups to contribute to the debate and determine the social acceptance of homosexual behavior. I'm just showing that one of the tools of the homosexual propaganda side is not only false, but insulting. The difference between the "gay rights" struggle and the civil rights struggle is the difference between being shot with a water pistol and being shot with a 9mm. For anyone to think otherwise just shows how far civil rights really have to go in America.
|
What a wonderful opinion that I completly disagree with because of my set of morals. The difference between you're treatment of gays and past treatment of african-americans is negligable when taking into account what is socially acceptable in both different time frames. BTW, how many gay bashings are there every year?