Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NCB
A intresting example was made last night on one of the nightly news shows. Scott Peterson, who was just sentenced to death, automatically gets an appeal before a federal judge. Terri Schiavo's case is ultimately a death sentence. Why should get a convicted murderer and baby killer get more legal protection than an innocent woman? Does that not seem upside down?
|
In the abstract, yes it does. What you are intentionally ignoring is the 14 years that have stood between her collapse and now. M. Schiavo didnt just abandon her, there were therapies tried and failed. Doctors have given their opinions and he has chosen, based on their familial conversations between spouses. Death is not the important issue in this, its the decision that terri made about how she would NOT want to live.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NCB
Yeah, I'm gonna start looking for it. I learn more and more everyday about this case. The more I learn, the more heartbreaking this story gets.
|
I would certainly be willing to change my position if unbiased evidence was given that she was ambulatory during the first two years.