Quote:
|
Originally Posted by raveneye
Has anybody encountered Joseph Wambaugh's reverse opinion that female cops are better than male cops?
Apparently he spoke before the LA city council in 1992 in favor of preferential hiring of female cops, saying they were superior to male cops. The council agreed, and hired more female cops.
Here's an editorial in the Seattle-Post Intelligencer from March 25:
(no link available)
|
So when more female cops are hired, and more shootings of citizens by female cops happen, are the Liberals going to not bitch and moan about those shootings, since they were the result of putting more women with guns out there?
Coulter's article says that shootings go up when there are more female cops out there. That makes some sense intellectually, since there are less options in the use of non-lethal force for a female cop than a male cop. Anybody care to rebut the studies she mentioned?
Why not attack her message instead of attacking her personally? That makes it at least appear that there's a counter-Coulter argument, instead of simple ad-homs due to the moral bankruptcy and indefensibility of one's position.