|
What is the next step? Compromise? What for? Is a mutually agreed upon blending of opinons going to become federal law?
Hardly.
What is the point of this thread? Since when are we not here to continually and endlessly discuss issues? Since when are we supposed to sacrifice our opinion to find "common ground" with 5 or 8 TFP members? What is the benefit of blending opinions into something no one fully agrees with? Is the intent to file the issue away and whenever its brought up again to point to it and say, "oh no need, we've already figured out what to do with that issue"? Or is the intent to pretend like something valuable is being accomplished when we mututally agree upon a solution that no one likes? And if it is neither of those things, what is the intent?
Someone once said:
If you and I both agree on everything, one of us is unnecessary.
This is a discussion board - we're not supposed to agree.
|