Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NCB
No they're not. They're prevented from redefining the institution of marriage to suit their wants. They can marry anytime they want, hence, they are not discriminated against.
|
So your saying that "civil union"
is marriage, right?
Well then you should be in complete support of removing the marriage laws from the law books of the states and replacing said laws with the laws for civil unions as they are currently worded.
After all, if it is the same thing, then there isn't a difference anyway. Why bother with the word Marriage for hetro or homo if civil union is the same. Unless of course their's a difference between the two you'd like to comment on...
And I'm glad to see we all agree that your mentioning of the Constitution was utterly deviod of any meaning or argument. In that case, you wouldn't mind going back and editing it out.