Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
Where in the Constitution does it indicate that only hetersexuals can marry? It's a question of discrimination. Discrimination is unconstitutional.
But now I understand. You are simply expressing your displeasure at the ruling by claiming the judge did something he shouldn't have. You interpret the Constitution differently than the judge and therefore you disagree with the judge. That doesn't mean the judge has "overstepped his bounds" - it just means you disagree with the outcome.
Which is what I suspected.
|
Silly argument. I can counter with where does it say in the Const. that you cannot do 90MPH in a 55MPH zone, but that would be equally as silly.
So to answer my own question, the homosexual lobby makes it's argument that it's found under the EPC. However, their argument falls short because homosexuals are not prevented from marrying.