|
Where in the Constitution does it indicate that only hetersexuals can marry? It's a question of discrimination. Discrimination is unconstitutional.
But now I understand. You are simply expressing your displeasure at the ruling by claiming the judge did something he shouldn't have. You interpret the Constitution differently than the judge and therefore you disagree with the judge. That doesn't mean the judge has "overstepped his bounds" - it just means you disagree with the outcome.
Which is what I suspected.
|