Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
Other than a displeasure at the result (or at least the simple parroting of someone else who has displeasure at the result), I'm not clear where that concept comes from.
|
Attacking someone for an argument you cannot defend is not an argument.
Quote:
Judges constantly adjust or redefine laws. The people's majority might want something to be a law, but if that something is in opposition to the Constitution, the people's majority can't have it. What you are suggesting is mob rule.
|
Just because they do, doesn't give them the constitutional power to do so. Having 1,3, or 5 judges deciding what should be and what should not be law is not a good thing for a democracy. Communism, yes, but not a democracy.