Quote:
|
I am disputing the 3,000/45-60,000 deaths each year that they are trying to tie to passive smoke.
|
Disputing it on what basis? Your own personal hunches?
Quote:
|
My feeling is that passive smoke is no more dangerous than the smog most of us breathe on a daily basis, maybe less.
|
And what research paper did you read to come to that conclusion? How can you possibly simply know this? Are you suggesting that we don't need to do any research whatsoever to find out how dangerous SHS is, we can just think about it a little bit and simply know the answer?
Quote:
|
Like I said, I am not disputing that SHS is a dangerous substance.
|
Which is the reason that I asked my previous question that you still haven't answered: how many people will you allow it to kill each year before you think it would be justified to ban SHS?
Quote:
|
The SHS studies seem to go about it backwards. They were looking to prove that SHS killed a lot of people. And, when evidence didn't agree with them, they excluded the evidence to reach their goal. Then, others hoped on the bandwagon and added on to the already flawed research.
|
So it sounds like you've already made up your mind, and nothing is going to convince you otherwise. Is that the case?
If it is, say so, and we can call it a day.