Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

KMA-628 · 03-10-2005, 02:03 PM

llow -

I tried to quote you, but that was way too much of a pain in the ass.

So...

I never said smoking the home wasn't harmful - you need to edit that because it is completely false.

As to the EPA report: EPA was struck down as flawed because they rejected evidence that didn't back up their assertion. I even cited the 13 articles in question. Your article didn't cover that at all. It doesn't matter who challenged them--it only matters that they were challenged. Even the tobacco industry, regardless of what you think of them, has a right to defend themselves.

Does the EPA have a reason for rejecting studies that didn't say what they wanted?

03-10-2005, 02:03 PM	#257 (permalink)
KMA-628 ....is off his meds...you were warned. Location: The Wild Wild West	llow - I tried to quote you, but that was way too much of a pain in the ass. So... I never said smoking the home wasn't harmful - you need to edit that because it is completely false. As to the EPA report: EPA was struck down as flawed because they rejected evidence that didn't back up their assertion. I even cited the 13 articles in question. Your article didn't cover that at all. It doesn't matter who challenged them--it only matters that they were challenged. Even the tobacco industry, regardless of what you think of them, has a right to defend themselves. Does the EPA have a reason for rejecting studies that didn't say what they wanted? __________________ Before you criticize someone, you need to walk a mile in their shoes. That way, if they get angry at you.......you're a mile away.......and they're barefoot.