|
BOR -
Rather than me arbitrarily picking a position, I wanted to see if a trend developed that could then be removed from this discussion and worked out in a different thread.
For example, if enough people said they were open to some form of concessions on, say, Drug Laws, then I would know that it is a topic that might be discussed to a fruitful compromise.
Hand-picking one position will just lead to what we have already--pages and pages of "you're wrong" and "no, you're wrong".
Does that make sense?
Then maybe we can start a string of "Compromise" threads, following the trends that develop. Rather than hash out an opinion, we could see if compromise can be reached.
If enough people say, "I can't compromise on foreign policy" then I know to not start a "Compromise" thread over that topic, because it would obviously go nowhere.
__________________
Before you criticize someone, you need to walk a mile in their shoes. That way, if they get angry at you.......you're a mile away.......and they're barefoot.
|