Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakk
They wanted it to be secure, so theives couldn't get at weapon locations and use them as shopping lists.
They wanted it to be seperate from the police networks, so that gun ownership wouldn't show up in the same kind of searches as for criminals.
Basically, they let the practical simplicity of the situation get overrun with 'but, what about' exceptions. That is the problem when you try to make controversial legislation more paletable.
|
Even with all the 'but, what about' exceptions I still don't see the complication. In fact it is easier to have a secure system if is not connected to any other system.
Of course I don't know all the requirements in detail, but I can't imagine how they even considered spending what they budgeted to spend.