Quote:
|
Originally Posted by raveneye
And this is the fourth time this report has been referred to or linked to in this thread.
So to summarize: Yes there is an obvious, objectively demonstrable scientific consensus that SHS is a significant risk for cancer, heart disease, and lung disease.
|
You just don't get it do you, I will try again.
I agree that second-hand smoke is bad, to a degree.
I, however, totally disagree with your "significant" assertion and you haven't provided squat-shit to back that up. Why do you keep missing this and posting the same shit and then repeat your "significant" line?
Is my point, whether you agree with it or not, getting across yet.
Also, the NIH study is linked to the EPA study - whaddya think that means?