KMA-628

I think I am abusing my terms.

I am referring to a study where there isn't an intended result.

In other words, we want to study second-hand smoke, not study to see the dangers of second-hand smoke--the later has an obvious bias going into it.

But, I think you knew what I meant even if I am linguistically-challanged.

What about my comments regarding using a proven, bogus study as the very first reference.

Anyhow, my egg comment isn't to disprove anything scientific, it is just to show that science isn't the be all and end all of society. Scientists can put out bogus information just as easily as I can. Plus, it is very easy to make a study prove what you want it to prove--it just depends on how you handle your "victims".

__________________
Before you criticize someone, you need to walk a mile in their shoes. That way, if they get angry at you.......you're a mile away.......and they're barefoot.