Quote:
|
Why are we talking about DD?
|
Because:
(1) KMA brought up DD as an argument by analogy to refute the idea that banning second-hand smoke is good.
(2) you brought up alcohol as an argument by analogy to refute the idea that banning second-hand smoke is good.
Now that it is clear that the analogy with alcohol actually does the exact reverse of what you and KMA want it to do, you suddenly wonder why we are talking about alcohol.
We are talking about alcohol and DD, because, in analogy, it makes the reasons for banning second-hand smoke crystal clear.
Is there anything about the argument that you don't understand?