Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pigglet
I'm not sure if the "over emotional" tag was aimed specifically at me, or at the others speaking up in favor of environmental (tree-hugger use this time) awareness, but I will dismiss it as a strawman attack with mild emotional appeal.
|
My point was that this data is being used to fuel emotional appeal to get their side of the argument talked about.
It is nice to say that global warming is all man's fault, but we have seen large meathane gas eruptions in the sea. Tjhese releases are far larger than what we puit out from our cars. And we all know Meathane is a "green house gas."
So, the world is heating up on its own, and we are not taking time to really look at our data. All these theroies are all based off each other. I do not trust this data that is coming out, because I have seen both sides of the argument and the global warming side has less data that spans a lesser time period.