View Single Post
Old 03-05-2005, 07:31 AM   #83 (permalink)
sapiens
Junkie
 
sapiens's Avatar
 
Location: Some place windy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
I understood that to be what you meant. And my bet still stands.You just changed the result.
The result changed because the the Waller study is an additional source of evidence. Its results are different, but complimentary to the other sources of evidence I mention earlier.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
We're not talking about improvement over ones parents' SES - we're talking some degree of parity with upper class. IQ is very rarely going to take someone from the poorest family to significant wealth - though it likely would result in an some degree of increase in SES.
I still say that if you control for IQ, SES doesn't predict as much variance as IQ controlled for SES... but it doesn't look like we will resolve this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RangerDick
So THAT'S the soution. If only poor people and rich people socialized more, poor people would receive more money?
I don't think that getting poor people and rich people together for block parties regularly is going to equalize economic differences (that's a caricature, of course). It would have to be a massive, fundamental environmental intervention (like adoption). Even in such a case, I think class differences would eventually emerge again.
sapiens is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62