|
Beh. How cares? The writer is using the same techniques as Moore does to discredit Moore. If the author dislikes Moore so much, why does he emulate him?
Personally, I really don't give a damn either way. Moore is a film-maker, a story teller, who chooses to make controversial pseudo-documentaries. He's very good at making controversial pseudo-documentaries. He's not a saint, or a movement leader, but a man who says what he thinks, and has built enough news around him for his voice to be heard when he does. He's not necessarily believed or trusted, but he is heard. I'm glad he's around, poking around, making life difficult for the establisment, it stops them from being lazy. But I do wish he had a little more integrity - but it isn't shock news to come out with the 'truth' about Moore saying he's not perfect.
|