Quote:
Originally Posted by DDDDave
I'm just posing another side to the story.
Everyone here has said 'Throw those fuckers in jail for the rest of their lives'. I am saying that is just not realistic, and not appropriate. How many others have said ' Shoot him dead on the spot' Really? I am glad none of you have guns.
The crime he committed was an assault. It was an ugly incident, no doubt. Question for all of you gun toters out there. You see a fight in the parking lot of your local Wal-Mart. Two yahoos are going at it and one guy is getting beat down. Do you pull out your gun and shoot dead the guy who is winning the fight? Why not? Who is right, who is wrong. What are they fighting about. What business is it of yours. Do you pull your gun and say 'Stop it or I'll shoot'. Yeah, right. That shit is for the movies. You do not pull your gun to threaten someone, you pull your gun to use it. The law everywhere in this country is your life must be in immediate danger to justify using deadly force. Want to keep a rifle on your nightstand, fine. Say a 20 y.o. black kid rings your doorbell at midnight and asks to use the phone. You open the door and the kid says give me all your money. Can you shoot him dead? No. Why didn't you just shut the door? Why did you open the door in the first place? Was your life in immediate danger. That is the standard that must be met. Most people are not aware of that and thankfully most of us will never be placed in that situation.
|
In the hypothetical situation you are asking about, if MY life is not in immediate danger and I can stand far enough away that if I need to shoot him I can, yes, you pull your weapon and tell the guy to back off. If the guy thats winning is still pounding the guy thats on the ground, major damage, even death, can happen. THATS what you're stopping. If the guy refuses to stop then you shoot him. IF you're good enough, you shoot him in the ass. If you're not, by statute you would be justified in saving what you would consider an impending death.