|
I believe there is a formal name for the argument/debate tactic of throwing so much information (related or not) into the debate the the otherside is simply incapable of responding due to shear volume.
If anyone happens to recall it, I would appreciate it.
As to this post, I agree with the above.
The 2000/2004 election material has nothing to do with the thread title or main argument.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis
The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!
Please Donate!
|