that only works if you make some seperation between the principles that bush throws about and the actual type of pseudo-democratic regime he presides over in the states. i dont see how this split would work. it seems somewhere between naieve and disengenuous.
yakk:
if i wrote for you i would be concerned about your various problems with the lack of caps.
but as it stands, i dont.
so i am not.
i am not sure that you want to start playing the game of formal criticism of how arguments are structured with me, however...it would be really easy to go line by line through your posts above and leave nothing standing at the conceptual level.
it seems about par for the course that you would couple an expression fo aesthetic displeasure (and nothing more) with a series of arbitrary assertions about content.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|