View Single Post
Old 02-24-2005, 12:26 PM   #87 (permalink)
yster
Tilted
 
We don't let little kids play with loaded revolvers, because it's pretty clear from past instances that bad things will happen. Whatever your take on religion, clearly 16 year olds aren't going to be stable parents, and it is just going to mess up her life and chances to acquire the stability that she would need to one day become a good parent. It is not the fault of those on welfare that they are there, people don't choose their education, upbringing, or life circumstances that lead to one's station in life at 16; but it is clear that while welfare is a stopgap to keep people from falling too far, it does little to help them become productive members of society. It is usually too late. Yeah, 16 year olds are dumb, they have sex, they're just kids, whatever- but the guy should know better. 20 to 15/16 is okay, but 20 to 12 isn't? 20 to 8? It's not religion, it's common sense.
The father is clearly not responsible or intelligent enough to care for the baby on his own, so the law should compel him to, just like Vic is trying to have accomplished. He is half-responsible for that kid, so whatever your take on breadwinning, he should at least pay his share.
yster is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76