Quote:
|
Originally Posted by retsuki03
Again. There is no science. Dr Mark New of Oxford University does not offer and evidence to show why he arrived at this conclusion. Although, again, I would like to see it.
|
Of course there's no science there... It's a news brief. The whole idea is to give you the point without drawing you into a 10-page essay.
Here, you want the science, have it.
WWF Arctic Report
Dr. New's report is in there (page 7) along with a few others. If you want to go read it and try to point out something he did wrong, go ahead. Oh, let me guess... You're not going to believe anything it concludes because it's a simulation. Well, how else are we going to do climate prediction? Can you propose a method of climate prediction, taking into account all the significant variables, which doesn't involve a computational model?