View Single Post
Old 02-22-2005, 08:54 PM   #59 (permalink)
filtherton
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by irateplatypus
oh come on filtherton, your language clearly indicates you proposed it as a fact. another caveat, your original question asked if christian influence was a good thing... then you asked if increased fundamentalism in government was a good thing. you can't have it both ways because they are not the same thing.
I made clarifications further along in the thread about my original intent. It only seems like i want it both ways because you haven't been paying attention, as is evidenced by your mention of the founding fathers.
You assume that when i speak for myself i am speaking on behalf of the entire kingdom of facts. You doubt my premise all you want, it doesn't bother me. I didn't make this thread to convince anyone about an increase in the fundamentalism of our nation's leaders. Many people came to that conclusion without any help from me. Even so, that idea is peripheral to my point in this thread.

Quote:
for the record, i do believe that any increase in christian morality is a good thing for our country. i don't care if the inspiration for such thought comes from buddha, mohammed, confucious or john doe... as long as it aligns with christian moral principles i do not care an ounce for its source. being a christian myself, i don't believe that christ's message is just good for me... i believe it holds redemption for all of mankind.
Fair enough, but what if those in power aren't the same kind of christian as you? Their christian ideals may be different than yours. There are many christians who believe that christ would endorse gay marriage. There are many christians who don't believe in war. Which christian morals would you want to see? Your own, of course. How does that work?

Quote:
when religion (not morality mind you) plays a role in government it tends to pervert both. that is why i support the moral standards of christianity being public policy though i would abhor christianity being established as a state religion or steps taken in that direction.
I see what you're saying, but christianity can't even agree on which morals are important and which aren't. How is christianity in any kind of position to be the standard by which moral standards are judged?
filtherton is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360