Wasn't the boy raped? Because the real issue was how NAMBLA and their whack ass pedistry literature facilitated the crime. Much like how hate literature found on the persons or property of someone who murdered as a means of hate crime would be gone after. If you got someone inciting behavior, then someone does said behavior, in the context that said behavior is illegal as pedistry is, NAMBLA should've had their balls stapled to the wall.
** The culprits were not charged with rape, but the it was asserted during the trial that there was conspiracy to rape the boy, and that he was murdered after he turned down the sexual advances**
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Last edited by Mojo_PeiPei; 02-21-2005 at 06:15 PM..
|