Quote:
|
Originally Posted by daswig
And here I thought it was because they were simply illiterate.... 
The supposedly DEFINITIVE report says that they found stockpiles of chemical weapons. They weren't new production, which is what Bush gave as the reason for going into Iraq, but they were still dangerous chemical weapons. Then there was the case of the binary SARIN shell that was turned into an IED that "fizzled".
No matter how you slice it, they DID find prohibited chemical weapons in Iraq, and the fact that Bush isn't smart enough to point this out doesn't alter the fact. |
(ooops.....on edit, I just read your post, C4 Diesel. I apologize for the
thread hijacking. I am disappointed, though, that no one has posted any
comments in response to the info I posted here on David Horowitz, the man
who organized and promoted this academic accountability movement.)
daswig, you ever read or hear something while you are drinking a liquid, that
you react to by laughing spontaneously, and that causes your nose to fill
up with your beverage and it blows out your nose ? I wasn't drinking anything
when I read your latest reply, but my reaction was the same as if I was.
I couldn't understand the guys who voted for Bush because they considered
him to be someone that they thought they would enjoy having a beer with.
Now, after reading your post, I feel a perverse desire to sit down with you
and a couple of beers, and shoot the shit with you until the product of your twisted mind has me snorting beer out my nostrils........