Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
The reason that Bush & Co didn't cite your example is because Perle and
the pre-invasion Bush talking points, spin machine, tried to make Blix and
the UN inspectors look ridiculous, as Oliver North spun it......Keystone Kops,
because Blix's inspectors revisited previously sites, such as the one you
now cite, "Al Muthanna" instead of looking for new ones.
ending:
Only the closeminded can be more wrong than these assholes are, daswig...
|
And here I thought it was because they were simply illiterate....
The supposedly DEFINITIVE report says that they found stockpiles of chemical weapons. They weren't new production, which is what Bush gave as the reason for going into Iraq, but they were still dangerous chemical weapons. Then there was the case of the binary SARIN shell that was turned into an IED that "fizzled".
No matter how you slice it, they DID find prohibited chemical weapons in Iraq, and the fact that Bush isn't smart enough to point this out doesn't alter the fact.