View Single Post
Old 02-13-2005, 06:56 AM   #67 (permalink)
brianna
Addict
 
Location: nyc
ok -- i was not saying that ANYONE here had said anything intentionally sexist. The idea that i was trying to get across is that the concept of prejudging anyone based on what you assume their mood to be is a bad idea. It is not possible to guess at how anyone feels based on a schedule (even if that schedule had been confirmed by the person in question.). Further more this is not your responsibility. As individuals we are all responsible for our own feelings and actions and no person (in this case man) should be expected to predict another persons mood or its likely outcome.

the point i've been trying to make (and i don't think that i've attacked anyone in my effort to make it but perhaps i have not been the best communicator) is that the concept of casting woman as different and confusing is something that has happened through history and has often led to marginalizing women as a whole (I don't feel any need to cite a specific example here as their is little argument that sexism has existed in our society). I am NOT saying that this is what you are trying to do here, only that your actions resemble those that in the past have served to cast women as lesser.

I don't see how this schedule is necessary -- if you're in a healthy committed relationship you should talk to your SO about her moods (not only as they might connect to her menstrual cycle but in general) and make an effort to understand her as an individual not just as someone who has a uterus. People are much more complicated than any schedule can convey. How does having this general idea of what one person thinks every woman's schedule is like help you to better understand your partner? What do we gain by guessing about how someone might feel instead of asking them directly? Why do you think that woman are more affected by hormones than men?

<off topic> a word about communicating: I used to be very active in tilted politics. I am no longer likely to post there because I found that people were less interested in hearing the opinions of others than they were in "winning" the debate. Making assumptions about how someone is reacting to your words and accusing them of having ulterior motives (like: "You were hurt by this thread for some reason, and you think it's only fair to hurt men back.") is never conducive to civilized debate. You'll do nothing more than upset the other person and turn a discussion into a fight. I would love to see less of this on TFP in general.
brianna is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360