View Single Post
Old 02-11-2005, 07:30 PM   #35 (permalink)
Lebell
Cracking the Whip
 
Lebell's Avatar
 
Location: Sexymama's arms...
Quote:
Originally Posted by RangerDick
Income tax is a whole 'nother ball of wax, Lebell. But, for the sake of argument, why should someone who is unemployed (and by definition, not paying any income tax) decide on how the income tax that pay YOU pay, be spent?
Well,

To me both questions boil down to a question of how does a society define the electorate.

The ancient Greeks defined it as white men, while we have a much broader definition.

If there were any restrictions I could choose, I would tend towards something like those in "Starship Troopers", i.e., you have to successfully complete a term of federal service before taking responsibility of controlling the government.

But as I know that won't happen, I just don't see that it would be practical to try to limit the elegibility as has been proposed.

This is separate from the logic of it.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis

The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!

Please Donate!
Lebell is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52