Quote:
|
So saying to use CSS-P instead of tables is like saying to use OOP and document your code. It may make things harder in the beginning and take longer, but eventually it will pay off big time.
|
Hm, not really. The project I'm on now... it would be a complete waste of time to try and memorize CSS in such a manner that would allow me to account for every ridiculous workaround that would simply take a few seconds to do in tables. Plus you have to memorize everything about IE vs Firefox vs. Opera... etc.
Maybe if a site had 1000 pages but.. 20 pages or so... I can deal with using tables. There really isn't much of a difference at all.
CSS has a long way to go before it's anywhere near how people treat it. It's current design is hideously flawed. Go ahead, try and vertically align something with an undefined height without coming up with some asinine workaround with unnecessary divs. Most things in CSS are done only with some complicated workaround that... really shouldn't be to begin with.