Quote:
Originally Posted by C4 Diesel
The original purpose of political parties was to unite legislators and voters with similar political views, and to a lesser extent for simplification of governance. Thomas Jefferson was against this (which even then was a 2-party system), himself being concerned that this would split the country (pretty good foresight, huh?). Now the purpose of political parties is much more marred to the individual. While the parties still hold opposing viewpoints, many of which target different groups, they have gained new purpose. I don't think anyone would argue that either party would like nothing more than to have total governmental control. James Carville, on Meet the Press last November, asserted to Tim Russert that the modern-day purpose of the political parties is "to get people elected". All but the most sure-seated legislators (who barely need to put effort into getting reelected) are forced to adopt a political stance in relatively strict conformation with their party in order to get funding for their campaigns. The parties' agendas are no longer based around what they believe to be right, but what they can sell to the American people, not to mention that the truth is regularly and severely bent for "cosmetic" reasons.
|
While an early Jefferson denounced political parties, both him and Madison in their later years realized that political parties within a political system are inevitable. Without an organized political body to mobilize voters we never would have even had a constitution (Federalists anyone?) Yes, in early documents the Framers denounce factions and the threat of a tyranny of majority and all that. But in Madison's revisions of The Federalist papers he deems parties "a necessary evil."
In light of that, I think that today the bigger problem is our current dominating two-party and majority-rule system. Just look at what percentage of the people ended up as "losers" in this last election. If we had a proportional system with many parties less people would be dissatisfied with our government and with democracy in general. But this is only part of the problem...read Robert Dahl's book
How Democratic is the American Constitution and you might just come to find out the answer is: Not very.