Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fckm
for only 60%? Is that actually significant? I don't know anything about bioinfomatics, but it seems kinda low. I wouldn't go around calling it the "gay gene" on a 60% match.
|
60 percent is Very significant especially when they are finding a GROUP of genes sequenced the same and not found in non-gays. Remember that this is not about ONE gene.. but a whole section of genes.
also there were sections in other gays that were similar.... but not 'the same'.