View Single Post
Old 02-10-2005, 03:28 PM   #23 (permalink)
Willravel
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorgelito
I disagree. North Korea is a "hermit Kingdom". Really, who would be an aggressor to them? China? nope. Japan? Nope. South Korea? Nope, that's a "family" squabble, none of our business. So then, defense against whom?
You probably know what I'm going to say here. I'll just come out and say it. It is possible that the United States will decide again to do a preemptive strike to try and diram them and remove their hostile government. It's happaned before. Whether it's likely in reality or not is debatable, but I'm sure they see it as a huge risk. While the Second Gulf war is far from a success, we were very good at removing the governmental officials in the Ba'ath Party from power, or their lives, when we invaded Iraq. If we did invade NK the way we did in Iraq, Kim Jong and most of his budddies will either be dead or imprisoned as a result. That is the worst possible scenereo for them. In order to deter us, they decided to go the Cold War route and use perliforation. It's possible. Not probable, but possible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jorgelito
I believe they're just trying to blackmail the world for concessions. It's time we draw a line in the sand here.

I'm only concerned that there isn't anything we can do about it. For the first time in my life, I have doubts about our own military capability.
You believe, but there seriosuly is no way to be 100% sure. That was kinda my point. It's all speculation until something happens.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jorgelito
Oddly, I agree with the Bush naysayers (from previous thread) about "why didn't we invade Iran, N. Korea, why Iraq etc..." but for entirely different reasons.

Iran, N. Korea definitely are real threats to our security (and the world too). It kind of sucks to be called out and unable to do anything about it. Apparently, we lack the man power etc. Both Iran and N. Korea need to be "relieved" of their nuclear capability.
Everyone should be relieved of nuclear capability , imho. The world would be a lot safer without them. Too bad it's too late for that.

Last edited by Willravel; 02-10-2005 at 03:39 PM..
Willravel is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360