Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mojo_PeiPei
Oh you're right, if they are inconvenient they are a problem and therefore expendable.
Why do we give public money to fund retards? They are a drain on society and resources, maybe euthinise them, they have an extra chromsome right, they aren't human like me and you. Also they don't have the same mental capacity as a fully grown and "normal" human.
Hey aren't darkies predisposed to crime and rape, they make up a big drain on society, I mean what through prison population (cause they are predisposed to crime). Hell there are more naggars (hihi clayton bigsby) on welfare then other minorities, they aren't paying into SS, maybe our great Hero Margaret Sanger was right about Eugenics and black people.
|
Is this the thread where all of my posts get read-into way too much? I said none of those things. When you see me post something, all you have to do is read it and take all of the words at face value. I try to be as explicit as i need to be to make my position clear. I don't demand that you necessarily take everything i write and go one step further with it in the direction of your choosing. In fact, i would say that i prefer that you address what i wrote in the context of what it what it was referring to, instead of taking what i wrote completely out of context and then trying to use that out-of-context interpretation to somehow obscure the fact that you really have no answer for me that doesn't involve making a concession. In case you forgot, i was calling bullshit on your bold assertion that social security is currently threatened because of abortion. By all means, point me towards the no doubt numerous objective science-based studies that support the idea that abortion is a significant cause for the "problems with social security".