Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran
Let me get this straight. You are basing your argument on the opinion of a man who lived 2384 years ago and who believed the universe was 55 concentric crystal spheres with the earth at its center?
No offense, but this guy isn't exactly Dr. Science. I don't think I'd base my ideas on animal intelligence on someone who not only lacked expertise in so many things, but who insisted on believing in the infallibility of his thoughts despite evidence to the contrary
Besides, how does he know animals don't have a soul? How does he know humans do?
Bah.
|
soul Audio pronunciation of "soul" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (sl)
n.
1. The animating and vital principle in humans, credited with the faculties of thought, action, and emotion and often conceived as an immaterial entity.
2. The spiritual nature of humans, regarded as immortal, separable from the body at death, and susceptible to happiness or misery in a future state.
Link:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=soul
Yes, it is true that he lived over two thousand years ago and incorrectly interpreted the geography of the universe. However, this discussion is not about the galaxy...it is about human philosophy.
That being said, the fact that Aristotle's perception of the soul exists in the very DEFINITION of the modern sense of the term suggests his lasting appeal, so to speak.
A soul is DEFINED as a human trait...and this is based off of Aristotle's phislosophical views. Much of his most important work has stood the test of time, and his view of the geography of the universe, although now known to be inaccurate and scientifically proven incorrect, was quite advanced at the time. On the other hand, his philosophy about human knowledge and morality still remains an important element in discussing those issues.
Out.