Football Hall of Fame rant
After the recent HOF announcements, there were some disappointed fans, as there always are. Richard Dent, a superbowl MVP and one of the core of the '85 bears stellar defense, is not in. Nor is Art Monk, or Derrick Thomas or Harry Carson.
But Michael Irvin?!!
Come on!
This has been a tough week for Cowboy fans -more on the dynasty thing later-
Regarding the Hall of Fame:
The Cowboys are either America's team or the team everyone loves to hate, but they are certainly one of, if not THE most important and successful franchises in the NFL, comparable to the Lakers, Celtics, and Yankees in their leagues.
The Cowboys had a streak of 20 winning seasons in a row, unmatched in the NFL. Televising the Cowboys boosts ratings, and that's why the appear so frequently on national television, even when their record does not support it. The Cowboys have dominated any franchise based comparison of SuperBowl performance.
number of Superbowls (victories)
Dallas -8 , (5)
-
-
Denver - 6, (2)
-
San Fran - 5 (5)
Pittsburgh - 5 (4)
Washington - 5 (3)
Oakland - 5 (3)
Miami - 5 (2)
-
Green Bay -4 (3)
New England- 4 (3)
Minnesota -4 (0)
Buffalo - 4 (0)
-
Giants - 3 (2)
Rams -3 (1)
Not only that, but the Cowboy's 3 Superbowl losses were by 4 points or less, not blowouts.
Now consider this:
There are 193 players in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Only five played most of their careers with the Cowboys.
Yes, Tom Landry is one of 20 coaches, and Tex Schramm is one of 17 other administrators inducted. Mike Ditka played 3 years with the Cowboys, and there are 5 other players who played for the Cowboys a total of 6 seasons. (think Joe Montana for the Chiefs, Eric Dickerson with the Falcons, or Emmitt Smith as a Cardinal -doesn't really count.)
But just look at how many players other teams have in the Hall of Fame.
Some teams have a very long history and their HOF representation reflects this. On the other hand, some teams have far more representation than the Cowboys based on the modern era. Therefore, to make the comparison more fair, I've put those associated primarily with that team listed below since 1960 (the year the Cowboys started) in parentheses.
Bears - 26 inductees (8)
Packers - 20 (11)
Steelers - 17 (15)
Giants - 17 (8)
Browns - 15 (8)
Redskins - 15 (9)
Rams - 13 (9)
Raiders - 12 (12)
Lions - 12 (5)
49ers - 11 (11)
Cardinals - 10 (3)
Colts - 10 (10)
Dolphins - 9 (9)
Eagles - 8 (4)
Chiefs - 7 (7)
Vikings - 7 (7)
Chargers - 6 (6)
Oilers/Titans - 5 (5)
These numbers speak for themselves as to the anti-Cowboys prejudice of the Hall of Fame electors, but it gets worse for Cowboys fans.
Of the 12 final candidates over the past two years, only four have been denied election into the Hall of Fame. Three are former Cowboys.
Rayfield Wright and Bob Hayes were joined by Irvin this year. (Plus Cliff Harris who did not make the finals last year.)
I did not see Wright or Hayes play, but I did see Irvin, and his numbers should have been more than sufficient.
There are 17 wide receivers already in the Hall of Fame, but only two had more receptions than Irvin's 750, and only with more yards. Steve Young who got into the Hall this year spent time on the bench, and was 1-3 against Irvin's Cowboys in Championship games. Irvin has 3 Superbowl rings; Young has 1. From 1991 through 1998, Irvin had 1,000-yard seasons in all but one year. In 1995, he had his best season, catching 111 passes for 1,603 yards. Irvin went to five straight Pro Bowls beginning in 1991. Yeah, gaudy numbers for recievers are more prevalent in today's offenses than those in the past, but Irvin's 11 100-yard receiving games during the 1995 season is still an NFL record. Irvin totalled 750 catches for 11,904 yards in his career. He deserves in the Hall of Fame.
The bad weekend continued for Cowboys fans. Not only did Irvin not get in and #22 retire, but then everyone talks about the Patriots "dynasty" matching that of the Cowboys. Give me a break! Their 1st Superbowl win ranks as one of the hugest upsets in sports, and they got there with the help of a very questionable call. The next year, they didn't even make the playoffs, much less the championship game as the Cowboys did in their off year in the 4 year period. Three Superbowl wins, alright, but the winning margin in all three doesn't equal that of any of the Cowboy Superbowls victories, and the Cowboys certainly didn't need any last second field goals.
Dynasty? Please!
Last edited by dy156; 02-07-2005 at 10:09 AM..
|