View Single Post
Old 02-07-2005, 07:20 AM   #50 (permalink)
raeanna74
I'm not a blonde! I'm knot! I'm knot! I'm knot!
 
raeanna74's Avatar
 
Location: Upper Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic_Skafe
Regardless of how unfortunate the circumstances get for the girls it is only through their actions that this entire situation exists...
Their actions say they were willing to pay the woman's medical bills regardless of how responsible they may have felt for the bills. To me the situation should have been left there and never gone to court.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic_Skafe
It's an unfortunate situation but it's not the place of our court system to completely disregard the rights of people because of the intentions of others.
The court should not have allowed this woman to railroad the girls and charge them for court costs when she just as well could have gotten the medical bills paid WITHOUT the court costs. Because of the woman's lack of cooperation with the girls I don't believe that she should have been awarded the money. It reflects an unforgiving, spiteful, and possibly greedy attitude. Why else would she have taken the girls to court when they were willing to make things right in the first place?

And INTENTIONS play a large part in our courts. The question of whether harm was INTENDED to a person can mean more to a judgement than what specific harm was done.

Edit:typo
__________________
"Always learn the rules so that you can break them properly." Dalai Lama
My Karma just ran over your Dogma.

Last edited by raeanna74; 02-07-2005 at 03:38 PM..
raeanna74 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47